Reversing 30 years of discussion : why causal decision theorists should one-box

Spohn, Wolfgang

Reversing 30 years of discussion : why causal decision theorists should one-box

Dateien

Spohn_0-316204.pdfGröße: 1.3 MBDownloads: 1929

Datum

2012

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Philosophie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Synthese. 2012, 187(1), pp. 95-122. ISSN 0039-7857. eISSN 1573-0964. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-0023-5

Zusammenfassung

The paper will show how one may rationalize one-boxing in Newcomb’s problem and drinking the toxin in the Toxin puzzle within the confines of causal decision theory by ascending to so-called reflexive decision models which reflect how actions are caused by decision situations (beliefs, desires, and intentions) represented by ordinary unreflexive decision models.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

100 Philosophie

Zitieren

ISO 690

SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2012. Reversing 30 years of discussion : why causal decision theorists should one-box. In: Synthese. 2012, 187(1), pp. 95-122. ISSN 0039-7857. eISSN 1573-0964. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-0023-5

BibTex

@article{Spohn2012Rever-32544,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1007/s11229-011-0023-5},
  title={Reversing 30 years of discussion : why causal decision theorists should one-box},
  number={1},
  volume={187},
  issn={0039-7857},
  journal={Synthese},
  pages={95--122},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32544">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The paper will show how one may rationalize one-boxing in Newcomb’s problem and drinking the toxin in the Toxin puzzle within the confines of causal decision theory by ascending to so-called reflexive decision models which reflect how actions are caused by decision situations (beliefs, desires, and intentions) represented by ordinary unreflexive decision models.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-01-13T12:53:26Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>Reversing 30 years of discussion : why causal decision theorists should one-box</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/32544/3/Spohn_0-316204.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/32544/3/Spohn_0-316204.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-01-13T12:53:26Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32544"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja