Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Bader_0-390234.pdf
Bader_0-390234.pdfGröße: 701.5 KBDownloads: 344
Datum
2017
Autor:innen
Ellsiepen, Emilia
Koukoulioti, Vasiliki
Portele, Yvonne
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
FREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49
Zusammenfassung

The clause-initial position in German declarative main clauses – the so-called prefield – can be rather flexibly filled with almost any kind of constituent. In the first part of this paper, we give an overview of recent experiments that we ran to investigate the factors governing whether the subject or the object of a transitive verb is put into the prefield. The factors that we tested include the semantic roles assigned by the verb, the animacy of the arguments and the discourse status of the arguments. In agreement with findings from the prior literature, participants put the object argument into the prefield when this was favored by the manipulated factors, but they did not use object fronting for this purpose but passivization instead.
Corpus counts nevertheless show that object-initial sentences occur with some regularity, even if their frequency is low in comparison to subject-initial sentences. In the second part of this paper, we therefore make use of corpus evidence in order to explore the conditions under which object-initial sentences are produced. A conclusion emerging from our discussion is that the referential form of an object is an additional factor governing whether it is put into the prefield or not. This conclusion is supported by additional evidence from experiments obtaining acceptability judgments.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik
Schlagwörter
word order, German, language production, conceptual accessibility, discourse structure, referential form
Konferenz
DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”, 24. Feb. 2016 - 26. Feb. 2016, Konstanz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BADER, Markus, Emilia ELLSIEPEN, Vasiliki KOUKOULIOTI, Yvonne PORTELE, 2017. Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges. DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz, 24. Feb. 2016 - 26. Feb. 2016. In: FREITAG, Constantin, ed., Oliver BOTT, ed., Fabian SCHLOTTERBECK, ed.. Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2017, pp. 27-49
BibTex
@inproceedings{Bader2017Filli-36968,
  year={2017},
  title={Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges},
  publisher={University of Konstanz},
  address={Konstanz},
  booktitle={Two perspectives on V2 : The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”},
  pages={27--49},
  editor={Freitag, Constantin and Bott, Oliver and Schlotterbeck, Fabian},
  author={Bader, Markus and Ellsiepen, Emilia and Koukoulioti, Vasiliki and Portele, Yvonne}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36968">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ellsiepen, Emilia</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Portele, Yvonne</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-27T11:24:30Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Koukoulioti, Vasiliki</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Bader, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36968"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The clause-initial position in German declarative main clauses – the so-called prefield – can be rather flexibly filled with almost any kind of constituent. In the first part of this paper, we give an overview of recent experiments that we ran to investigate the factors governing whether the subject or the object of a transitive verb is put into the prefield. The factors that we tested include the semantic roles assigned by the verb, the animacy of the arguments and the discourse status of the arguments. In agreement with findings from the prior literature, participants put the object argument into the prefield when this was favored by the manipulated factors, but they did not use object fronting for this purpose but passivization instead.&lt;br /&gt;Corpus counts nevertheless show that object-initial sentences occur with some regularity, even if their frequency is low in comparison to subject-initial sentences. In the second part of this paper, we therefore make use of corpus evidence in order to explore the conditions under which object-initial sentences are produced. A conclusion emerging from our discussion is that the referential form of an object is an additional factor governing whether it is put into the prefield or not. This conclusion is supported by additional evidence from experiments obtaining acceptability judgments.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Filling the prefield : Findings and challenges</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Koukoulioti, Vasiliki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-27T11:24:30Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36968/1/Bader_0-390234.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36968/1/Bader_0-390234.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Portele, Yvonne</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ellsiepen, Emilia</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Bader, Markus</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen