Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdf
Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdfGröße: 11.14 MBDownloads: 1491
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Nenkov, Gergana Y.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012, 48(1), pp. 106-121. ISSN 0022-1031. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.002
Zusammenfassung

Building on Gollwitzer's (1990) mindset theory of action phases, it is proposed that the effects of assigned balanced deliberation on subsequent goal commitment are moderated by people's pre- versus postdecisional status. A balanced deliberation and impartial assessment of pros and cons is expected to reduce goal commitment in predecisional individuals, whereas a distortion of the assigned balanced deliberation and a partial focus on the pros of goal pursuit should defend and strengthen goal commitment in postdecisional individuals. Indeed, in Study 1, assigned deliberation on the pros and cons of pursuing a focal goal promoted stronger reported goal commitment in participants who had decided to pursue this goal, but reduced goal commitment for people who had not yet made such a decision. In Study 2, the same pattern of results emerged when goal commitment was indicated by planning to act on the goal. Study 3 replicated findings using a different decision status manipulation and goal persistence as a measure of commitment. Finally, results of Study 4 suggested that the increase in commitment produced by defensive postdecisional deliberation is consequential as it was found to drive real-life behavior by promoting goal-directed action. Moreover, Studies 2, 3, and 4 explored the underlying process and provided evidence that it is the partial focus on the pros of goal pursuit, meant to defend existing goal commitment, that drives postdecisional deliberation's strengthening effects on goal commitment. Implications for mindset theory, goal commitmenttheory, and decision making are discussed.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Deliberation, Goal commitment, Predecision action phase, Postdecision action phase, Defensiveness
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690NENKOV, Gergana Y., Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2012. Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012, 48(1), pp. 106-121. ISSN 0022-1031. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.002
BibTex
@article{Nenkov2012Preve-17367,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.002},
  title={Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness},
  number={1},
  volume={48},
  issn={0022-1031},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  pages={106--121},
  author={Nenkov, Gergana Y. and Gollwitzer, Peter M.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/17367">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17367/1/Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology ;  48 (2012), 1. - pp. 106-121</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17367"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-21T07:53:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Nenkov, Gergana Y.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-21T07:53:37Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Nenkov, Gergana Y.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Building on Gollwitzer's (1990) mindset theory of action phases, it is proposed that the effects of assigned balanced deliberation on subsequent goal commitment are moderated by people's pre- versus postdecisional status. A balanced deliberation and impartial assessment of pros and cons is expected to reduce goal commitment in predecisional individuals, whereas a distortion of the assigned balanced deliberation and a partial focus on the pros of goal pursuit should defend and strengthen goal commitment in postdecisional individuals. Indeed, in Study 1, assigned deliberation on the pros and cons of pursuing a focal goal promoted stronger reported goal commitment in participants who had decided to pursue this goal, but reduced goal commitment for people who had not yet made such a decision. In Study 2, the same pattern of results emerged when goal commitment was indicated by planning to act on the goal. Study 3 replicated findings using a different decision status manipulation and goal persistence as a measure of commitment. Finally, results of Study 4 suggested that the increase in commitment produced by defensive postdecisional deliberation is consequential as it was found to drive real-life behavior by promoting goal-directed action. Moreover, Studies 2, 3, and 4 explored the underlying process and provided evidence that it is the partial focus on the pros of goal pursuit, meant to defend existing goal commitment, that drives postdecisional deliberation's strengthening effects on goal commitment. Implications for mindset theory, goal commitmenttheory, and decision making are discussed.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17367/1/Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen