Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? : A Reply

Constantinides, George M.; Czerwonko, Michal; Jackwerth, Jens; Perrakis, Stylianos

Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? : A Reply

Dateien

2018-8-29 Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochasic Dominance Bounds_ A Reply.pdfGröße: 68.4 KBDownloads: 314

Datum

2021

Autor:innen

Constantinides, George M.

Czerwonko, Michal

Jackwerth, Jens

Perrakis, Stylianos

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Critical Finance Review. Now Publishers. 2021, 10(1), pp. 57-63. ISSN 2164-5744. eISSN 2164-5760. Available under: doi: 10.1561/104.00000090

Zusammenfassung

Constantinides and Perrakis (2002, 2007) derive a lower bound on the price of an option such that an investor increases her utility by buying the option at the ask price if the ask price is lower than the lower bound; and by writing the option at the bid price if the bid price is higher than upper bound. Contrary to the evidence in Constantinides, Jackwerth, and Perrakis (2009) and Constantinides, Czerwonko, Jackwerth and Perrakis (2011) who demonstrate several violations of mainly the upper bound on call prices and document a tradable anomaly by exploiting this mispricing, Wallmeier (2015) claims that practically all options on the S&P 500, Eurostoxx 50, and DAX indices lie within the bounds. The main reason for the discrepancy is that Wallmeier erroneously inflates the volatility input to the bounds by about 2% by using the at-the-money implied volatility which is approximately the risk-neutral volatility instead of the physical volatility, as required by the model.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

330 Wirtschaft

Zitieren

ISO 690

CONSTANTINIDES, George M., Michal CZERWONKO, Jens JACKWERTH, Stylianos PERRAKIS, 2021. Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? : A Reply. In: Critical Finance Review. Now Publishers. 2021, 10(1), pp. 57-63. ISSN 2164-5744. eISSN 2164-5760. Available under: doi: 10.1561/104.00000090

BibTex

@article{Constantinides2021Mispr-41353,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1561/104.00000090},
  title={Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? : A Reply},
  number={1},
  volume={10},
  issn={2164-5744},
  journal={Critical Finance Review},
  pages={57--63},
  author={Constantinides, George M. and Czerwonko, Michal and Jackwerth, Jens and Perrakis, Stylianos}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41353">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41353/1/2018-8-29%20Mispricing%20of%20Index%20Options%20with%20Respect%20to%20Stochasic%20Dominance%20Bounds_%20A%20Reply.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Czerwonko, Michal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-14T13:01:01Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Mispricing of Index Options with Respect to Stochastic Dominance Bounds? : A Reply</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Constantinides and Perrakis (2002, 2007) derive a lower bound on the price of an option such that an investor increases her utility by buying the option at the ask price if the ask price is lower than the lower bound; and by writing the option at the bid price if the bid price is higher than upper bound. Contrary to the evidence in Constantinides, Jackwerth, and Perrakis (2009) and Constantinides, Czerwonko, Jackwerth and Perrakis (2011) who demonstrate several violations of mainly the upper bound on call prices and document a tradable anomaly by exploiting this mispricing, Wallmeier (2015) claims that practically all options on the S&amp;P 500, Eurostoxx 50, and DAX indices lie within the bounds. The main reason for the discrepancy is that Wallmeier erroneously inflates the volatility input to the bounds by about 2% by using the at-the-money implied volatility which is approximately the risk-neutral volatility instead of the physical volatility, as required by the model.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Constantinides, George M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Czerwonko, Michal</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41353"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Jackwerth, Jens</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Perrakis, Stylianos</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Jackwerth, Jens</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41353/1/2018-8-29%20Mispricing%20of%20Index%20Options%20with%20Respect%20to%20Stochasic%20Dominance%20Bounds_%20A%20Reply.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-14T13:01:01Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Perrakis, Stylianos</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Constantinides, George M.</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Unbekannt