Does Exposure to Stereotype-Disconfirming Politicians Reduce the Effect of Stereotypes on Voting? : Evidence From Seven Plagiarism Scandals in Germany

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Herrmann_2-18epjr8wlt6488.pdf
Herrmann_2-18epjr8wlt6488.pdfGröße: 147.1 KBDownloads: 752
Datum
2018
Autor:innen
Tepe, Markus
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Political Psychology. 2018, 39(2), pp. 303-324. ISSN 0162-895X. eISSN 1467-9221. Available under: doi: 10.1111/pops.12408
Zusammenfassung

We examine whether exposure to several salient counterexamples reduces the effect of stereotypes on voting. By taking advantage of a series of seven plagiarism scandals in Germany—a country with high regard for academic credentials where academic titles (Dr. and Prof.) get printed on ballot papers—we test whether the tendency to vote for candidates with a doctor’s title decreased in the wake of the scandals. Using cross- sectional and longitudinal estimators and controlling for a large range of potential confounders, we find that the electoral advantage of candidates with a doctor’s title shrinks from a good half of a percentage point before the scandals down to a third after the scandals. In line with a subtyping hypothesis, the reduction is stronger for candidates from traditional middle-class parties (i.e., the parties of the politicians who were implicated in the scandals). Neither of these effects turns out to be strong enough to reach statistical significance, however. We conclude that seven negative examples in one legislative term had no noticeable effect on the tendency to select candidates based on academic titles. Our study provides a rare opportunity to test the effect of stereotype-disconfirming information on electoral behavior. Our results contribute to a literature demonstrating the resilience of stereotypes to disconfirming information. They also suggest that plagiarism affairs are unlikely to reduce electoral incentives for politicians to obtain a fake doctorate.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Dr., doctor’s title, doctor’s degree, doctorate, electoral success, stereotype change, subtyping
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690HERRMANN, Michael, Markus TEPE, 2018. Does Exposure to Stereotype-Disconfirming Politicians Reduce the Effect of Stereotypes on Voting? : Evidence From Seven Plagiarism Scandals in Germany. In: Political Psychology. 2018, 39(2), pp. 303-324. ISSN 0162-895X. eISSN 1467-9221. Available under: doi: 10.1111/pops.12408
BibTex
@article{Herrmann2018Expos-41958,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1111/pops.12408},
  title={Does Exposure to Stereotype-Disconfirming Politicians Reduce the Effect of Stereotypes on Voting? : Evidence From Seven Plagiarism Scandals in Germany},
  number={2},
  volume={39},
  issn={0162-895X},
  journal={Political Psychology},
  pages={303--324},
  author={Herrmann, Michael and Tepe, Markus}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41958">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41958/1/Herrmann_2-18epjr8wlt6488.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41958/1/Herrmann_2-18epjr8wlt6488.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Herrmann, Michael</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Tepe, Markus</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41958"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Tepe, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-06T09:33:53Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-06T09:33:53Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We examine whether exposure to several salient counterexamples reduces the effect of stereotypes on voting. By taking advantage of a series of seven plagiarism scandals in Germany—a country with high regard for academic credentials where academic titles (Dr. and Prof.) get printed on ballot papers—we test whether the tendency to vote for candidates with a doctor’s title decreased in the wake of the scandals. Using cross- sectional and longitudinal estimators and controlling for a large range of potential confounders, we find that the electoral advantage of candidates with a doctor’s title shrinks from a good half of a percentage point before the scandals down to a third after the scandals. In line with a subtyping hypothesis, the reduction is stronger for candidates from traditional middle-class parties (i.e., the parties of the politicians who were implicated in the scandals). Neither of these effects turns out to be strong enough to reach statistical significance, however. We conclude that seven negative examples in one legislative term had no noticeable effect on the tendency to select candidates based on academic titles. Our study provides a rare opportunity to test the effect of stereotype-disconfirming information on electoral behavior. Our results contribute to a literature demonstrating the resilience of stereotypes to disconfirming information. They also suggest that plagiarism affairs are unlikely to reduce electoral incentives for politicians to obtain a fake doctorate.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Does Exposure to Stereotype-Disconfirming Politicians Reduce the Effect of Stereotypes on Voting? : Evidence From Seven Plagiarism Scandals in Germany</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Herrmann, Michael</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen