Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf
Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdfGröße: 1.38 MBDownloads: 315
Datum
2019
Autor:innen
Belardi, Angelo
Lee, Jong-Hwan
Kim, Hyun-Chul
Stalujanis, Esther
Jung, Eun Kyung
Oh, Minkyung
Yoo, Seung-Schik
Tegethoff, Marion
Meinlschmidt, Gunther
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
F1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1
Zusammenfassung

Background: Stress-related mental and physical health issues burden modern societies. New treatment opportunities could help to lessen long-term detrimental consequences of stress.

Objective: To investigate whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRInf), aimed at modulating brain activity associated with a stressor, affects subjective mood and arousal.

Methods: In total, 30 males participated in a randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design. rtfMRInf was the intervention, sham-neurofeedback the control condition, and the Stroop task the stressor. We instructed participants to modulate their stress response to the Stroop task via feedback from their anterior cingulate cortex and their insular cortex, concomitantly applying mental strategies. We assessed mood with the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (dimensions: good/bad, GB; awake/tired, AT; and calm/nervous, CN), and subjective arousal with Self-Assessment Manikins (SAM).

Results: We found significantly higher subjective arousal after neurofeedback phases in the experimental condition as compared to the control condition [t(26.6) = −2.216, 95%CI [−2.188,−0.083], p = 0.035; t(27.9) = −3.252, 95%CI [−2.685,−0.609], p = 0.003], but no significant differences between the conditions regarding mood [GB: b = 0.4, 95%CI [−0.67, 1.47], p = 0.467; AT: b = 0.769, 95%CI [−0.319, 1.857], p = 0.177; CN: b = 0.5, 95%CI [−0.53, 1.53], p = 0.352]. In both conditions, there was significantly worse and more tired mood after the fMRI session as compared to before [GB:b = −0.77, 95% CI [−1.31, 0.23], p = 0.009; AT: b = −0.652, 95%CI [−1.116,−0.187], p = 0.01].

Conclusions: Findings indicate that rtfMRInf led to higher arousal, which may counteract the aim to reduce stress responses. Whether the multitasking situation has triggered this neurofeedback-related arousal – and how to circumvent it – asks for further study.

Trial registration: NCT01921088, ClinicalTrials.gov, 13th August 2013.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
arousal, dual task, multitasking, functional magnetic resonance imaging, mood, neurofeedback, psychological stress
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BELARDI, Angelo, Jong-Hwan LEE, Hyun-Chul KIM, Esther STALUJANIS, Eun Kyung JUNG, Minkyung OH, Seung-Schik YOO, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Marion TEGETHOFF, Gunther MEINLSCHMIDT, 2019. Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design. In: F1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1
BibTex
@article{Belardi2019-07-09neuro-46369,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.12688/f1000research.19403.1},
  title={Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design},
  volume={8},
  journal={F1000Research},
  author={Belardi, Angelo and Lee, Jong-Hwan and Kim, Hyun-Chul and Stalujanis, Esther and Jung, Eun Kyung and Oh, Minkyung and Yoo, Seung-Schik and Pruessner, Jens C. and Tegethoff, Marion and Meinlschmidt, Gunther},
  note={Article Number: 1031}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46369">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background: Stress-related mental and physical health issues burden modern societies. New treatment opportunities could help to lessen long-term detrimental consequences of stress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Objective: To investigate whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRInf), aimed at modulating brain activity associated with a stressor, affects subjective mood and arousal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods: In total, 30 males participated in a randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design. rtfMRInf was the intervention, sham-neurofeedback the control condition, and the Stroop task the stressor. We instructed participants to modulate their stress response to the Stroop task via feedback from their anterior cingulate cortex and their insular cortex, concomitantly applying mental strategies. We assessed mood with the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (dimensions: good/bad, GB; awake/tired, AT; and calm/nervous, CN), and subjective arousal with Self-Assessment Manikins (SAM).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results: We found significantly higher subjective arousal after neurofeedback phases in the experimental condition as compared to the control condition [t(26.6) = −2.216, 95%CI [−2.188,−0.083], p = 0.035; t(27.9) = −3.252, 95%CI [−2.685,−0.609], p = 0.003], but no significant differences between the conditions regarding mood [GB: b = 0.4, 95%CI [−0.67, 1.47], p = 0.467; AT: b = 0.769, 95%CI [−0.319, 1.857], p = 0.177; CN: b = 0.5, 95%CI [−0.53, 1.53], p = 0.352]. In both conditions, there was significantly worse and more tired mood after the fMRI session as compared to before [GB:b = −0.77, 95% CI [−1.31, 0.23], p = 0.009; AT: b = −0.652, 95%CI [−1.116,−0.187], p = 0.01].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: Findings indicate that rtfMRInf led to higher arousal, which may counteract the aim to reduce stress responses. Whether the multitasking situation has triggered this neurofeedback-related arousal – and how to circumvent it – asks for further study.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trial registration: NCT01921088, ClinicalTrials.gov, 13th August 2013.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-15T12:56:14Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-09</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46369"/>
    <dc:creator>Oh, Minkyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Jung, Eun Kyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lee, Jong-Hwan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46369/1/Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Stalujanis, Esther</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kim, Hyun-Chul</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yoo, Seung-Schik</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Belardi, Angelo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Meinlschmidt, Gunther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Kim, Hyun-Chul</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Stalujanis, Esther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Oh, Minkyung</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Yoo, Seung-Schik</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jung, Eun Kyung</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Belardi, Angelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-15T12:56:14Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Tegethoff, Marion</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46369/1/Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Tegethoff, Marion</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Lee, Jong-Hwan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Meinlschmidt, Gunther</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen