Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik

Wendelborn, Christian

Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik

Dateien

Wendelborn_2-1gxcai1csgohl8.pdfGröße: 582.75 KBDownloads: 428

Datum

2018

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Philosophie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 2018, 66(5), pp. 686-702. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2018-0048

Zusammenfassung

Peter Stemmer provides a moral theory that construes moral normativity and correlated phenomenona as essentially constituted by sanctions. Neither Stemmer nor his critics reflect sufficiently on the metaethical status of these claims, even though it is important to be clear about this status to evaluate the approach. I argue that there are two different readings of the theory: Either the “Sanktionstheorie” is a kind of descriptive metaethical theory or it is what I call a constructive (or revisionary) theory. Stemmer’s approach is better understood as a constructive metaethical theory, whereas critics mainly focus on a descriptive reading.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

normativity; moral theory; sanctions; metaethics; Peter Stemmer

Zitieren

ISO 690

WENDELBORN, Christian, 2018. Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 2018, 66(5), pp. 686-702. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2018-0048

BibTex

@article{Wendelborn2018-10-25Statu-45438,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1515/dzph-2018-0048},
  title={Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik},
  number={5},
  volume={66},
  issn={0012-1045},
  journal={Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie},
  pages={686--702},
  author={Wendelborn, Christian}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45438">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2018-10-25</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">Peter Stemmer provides a moral theory that construes moral normativity and correlated phenomenona as essentially constituted by sanctions. Neither Stemmer nor his critics reflect sufficiently on the metaethical status of these claims, even though it is important to be clear about this status to evaluate the approach. I argue that there are two different readings of the theory: Either the “Sanktionstheorie” is a kind of descriptive metaethical theory or it is what I call a constructive (or revisionary) theory. Stemmer’s approach is better understood as a constructive metaethical theory, whereas critics mainly focus on a descriptive reading.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-12T17:49:20Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/45438/1/Wendelborn_2-1gxcai1csgohl8.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/45438/1/Wendelborn_2-1gxcai1csgohl8.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-12T17:49:20Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45438"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Begutachtet

Ja