Viele Welten, viele Möglichkeiten und die Begrenzung des Menschen : Atomistische Ethik und Wissenschaftstheorie

Mahlke, Kirsten

Viele Welten, viele Möglichkeiten und die Begrenzung des Menschen : Atomistische Ethik und Wissenschaftstheorie

Dateien

Mahlke_2-ai8ilqf1yjip7.pdfGröße: 1.62 MBDownloads: 27

Datum

2023

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Literatur-, Kunst- und Medienwissenschaften

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

KÖNIG, Peter, ed., Oliver SCHLAUDT, ed.. Kosmos : Vom Umgang mit der Welt zwischen Ausdruck und Ordnung. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 2023, pp. 65-84. ISBN 978-3-96822-094-9. Available under: doi: 10.17885/heiup.857.c15252

Zusammenfassung

This paper addresses the ancient theory of the Many Worlds as formulated by Democritus, Epicurus, and Lucretius in their atomistic doctrines between the fifth and first century BCE. Their teachings radically challenge the notion that our own local cosmos is the only one. In letters, in the doctrines of Epicurus, and in the great verse epic De rerum natura of Lucretius, both the plurality of worlds and the epistemological basis of the terrestrial standards are subjected to a fundamental critique. In the Many Worlds theories examined here, the relationship of the observer to the object of his observation is always also thought of as a limiting and relational perspective. In the drafts, epistemological premises and ethical conclusions are formulated which, despite or precisely because of this de-limitation of the possibilities of the universe, repeatedly recall the conditions of human existence. The premise of many possibilities allows us to think about the many worlds without the biblical gesture of submission. The ethical and epistemological position and limitation of the observer serves as a philosophical foil for astrophysical many worlds theories of the twenty-first century, which are briefly introduced.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft

Schlagwörter

Many Worlds theory, atomism, ethics of limitation, epistemology, human scale, multi-causality, participant observation, tactile perception, Epicurus.

Zitieren

ISO 690

MAHLKE, Kirsten, 2023. Viele Welten, viele Möglichkeiten und die Begrenzung des Menschen : Atomistische Ethik und Wissenschaftstheorie. In: KÖNIG, Peter, ed., Oliver SCHLAUDT, ed.. Kosmos : Vom Umgang mit der Welt zwischen Ausdruck und Ordnung. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 2023, pp. 65-84. ISBN 978-3-96822-094-9. Available under: doi: 10.17885/heiup.857.c15252

BibTex

@incollection{Mahlke2023Viele-66775,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.17885/heiup.857.c15252},
  title={Viele Welten, viele Möglichkeiten und die Begrenzung des Menschen : Atomistische Ethik und Wissenschaftstheorie},
  isbn={978-3-96822-094-9},
  publisher={Heidelberg University Publishing},
  address={Heidelberg},
  booktitle={Kosmos : Vom Umgang mit der Welt zwischen Ausdruck und Ordnung},
  pages={65--84},
  editor={König, Peter and Schlaudt, Oliver},
  author={Mahlke, Kirsten}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66775">
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66775/1/Mahlke_2-ai8ilqf1yjip7.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Mahlke, Kirsten</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66775/1/Mahlke_2-ai8ilqf1yjip7.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>Viele Welten, viele Möglichkeiten und die Begrenzung des Menschen : Atomistische Ethik und Wissenschaftstheorie</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Mahlke, Kirsten</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-02T07:08:33Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-02T07:08:33Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66775"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>This paper addresses the ancient theory of the Many Worlds as formulated by Democritus, Epicurus, and Lucretius in their atomistic doctrines between the fifth and first century BCE. Their teachings radically challenge the notion that our own local cosmos is the only one. In letters, in the doctrines of Epicurus, and in the great verse epic De rerum natura of Lucretius, both the plurality of worlds and the epistemological basis of the terrestrial standards are subjected to a fundamental critique. In the Many Worlds theories examined here, the relationship of the observer to the object of his observation is always also thought of as a limiting and relational perspective. In the drafts, epistemological premises and ethical conclusions are formulated which, despite or precisely because of this de-limitation of the possibilities of the universe, repeatedly recall the conditions of human existence. The premise of many possibilities allows us to think about the many worlds without the biblical gesture of submission. The ethical and epistemological position and limitation of the observer serves as a philosophical foil for astrophysical many worlds theories of the twenty-first century, which are briefly introduced.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja