Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI : towards a harmonized segmentation protocol

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Yushkevich_2-gn2bmcj9v7ni1.pdf
Yushkevich_2-gn2bmcj9v7ni1.pdfGröße: 2.76 MBDownloads: 303
Datum
2015
Autor:innen
Yushkevich, Paul A.
Amaral, Robert S.C.
Augustinack, Jean C.
Bender, Andrew R.
Bernstein, Jeffrey D.
Boccardi, Marina
Bocchetta, Martina
Burggren, Alison C.
Zeineh, Michael M.
et al.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
NeuroImage. 2015, 111, pp. 526-541. ISSN 1053-8119. eISSN 1095-9572. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004
Zusammenfassung

Objective

An increasing number of human in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have focused on examining the structure and function of the subfields of the hippocampal formation (the dentate gyrus, CA fields 1 − 3, and the subiculum) and subregions of the parahippocampal gyrus (entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices). The ability to interpret the results of such studies and to relate them to each other would be improved if a common standard existed for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions. Currently, research groups label different subsets of structures and use different rules, landmarks, and cues to define their anatomical extents. This paper characterizes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the variability in the existing manual segmentation protocols for labeling hippocampal and parahippocampal substructures in MRI, with the goal of guiding subsequent work on developing a harmonized substructure segmentation protocol.

Method

MRI scans of a single healthy adult human subject were acquired both at 3 T and 7 T. Representatives from 21 research groups applied their respective manual segmentation protocols to the MRI modalities of their choice. The resulting set of 21 segmentations was analyzed in a common anatomical space to quantify similarity and identify areas of agreement.

Results

The differences between the 21 protocols include the region within which segmentation is performed, the set of anatomical labels used, and the extents of specific anatomical labels. The greatest overall disagreement among the protocols is at the CA1/subiculum boundary, and disagreement across all structures is greatest in the anterior portion of the hippocampal formation relative to the body and tail.

Conclusions

The combined examination of the 21 protocols in the same dataset suggests possible strategies towards developing a harmonized subfield segmentation protocol and facilitates comparison between published studies.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Hippocampus; Medial temporal lobe; Hippocampal subfields; CA1; CA2; CA3; Dentate gyrus; Subiculum; Entorhinal cortex; Perirhinal cortex; Parahippocampal gyrus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Segmentation; Unified protocol
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690YUSHKEVICH, Paul A., Robert S.C. AMARAL, Jean C. AUGUSTINACK, Andrew R. BENDER, Jeffrey D. BERNSTEIN, Marina BOCCARDI, Martina BOCCHETTA, Alison C. BURGGREN, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Michael M. ZEINEH, 2015. Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI : towards a harmonized segmentation protocol. In: NeuroImage. 2015, 111, pp. 526-541. ISSN 1053-8119. eISSN 1095-9572. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004
BibTex
@article{Yushkevich2015-05Quant-38327,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004},
  title={Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI : towards a harmonized segmentation protocol},
  volume={111},
  issn={1053-8119},
  journal={NeuroImage},
  pages={526--541},
  author={Yushkevich, Paul A. and Amaral, Robert S.C. and Augustinack, Jean C. and Bender, Andrew R. and Bernstein, Jeffrey D. and Boccardi, Marina and Bocchetta, Martina and Burggren, Alison C. and Pruessner, Jens C. and Zeineh, Michael M.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38327">
    <dc:contributor>Bender, Andrew R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-04-05T07:54:34Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38327/1/Yushkevich_2-gn2bmcj9v7ni1.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Bernstein, Jeffrey D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Bocchetta, Martina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI : towards a harmonized segmentation protocol</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Yushkevich, Paul A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Zeineh, Michael M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Augustinack, Jean C.</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Augustinack, Jean C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Burggren, Alison C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38327/1/Yushkevich_2-gn2bmcj9v7ni1.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Yushkevich, Paul A.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38327"/>
    <dc:contributor>Burggren, Alison C.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2015-05</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Bocchetta, Martina</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Bender, Andrew R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Amaral, Robert S.C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Amaral, Robert S.C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Boccardi, Marina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Bernstein, Jeffrey D.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Objective&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An increasing number of human in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have focused on examining the structure and function of the subfields of the hippocampal formation (the dentate gyrus, CA fields 1 − 3, and the subiculum) and subregions of the parahippocampal gyrus (entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices). The ability to interpret the results of such studies and to relate them to each other would be improved if a common standard existed for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions. Currently, research groups label different subsets of structures and use different rules, landmarks, and cues to define their anatomical extents. This paper characterizes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the variability in the existing manual segmentation protocols for labeling hippocampal and parahippocampal substructures in MRI, with the goal of guiding subsequent work on developing a harmonized substructure segmentation protocol.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Method&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MRI scans of a single healthy adult human subject were acquired both at 3 T and 7 T. Representatives from 21 research groups applied their respective manual segmentation protocols to the MRI modalities of their choice. The resulting set of 21 segmentations was analyzed in a common anatomical space to quantify similarity and identify areas of agreement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The differences between the 21 protocols include the region within which segmentation is performed, the set of anatomical labels used, and the extents of specific anatomical labels. The greatest overall disagreement among the protocols is at the CA1/subiculum boundary, and disagreement across all structures is greatest in the anterior portion of the hippocampal formation relative to the body and tail.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The combined examination of the 21 protocols in the same dataset suggests possible strategies towards developing a harmonized subfield segmentation protocol and facilitates comparison between published studies.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-04-05T07:54:34Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Boccardi, Marina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Zeineh, Michael M.</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen