Good and Evil in Recent Discussion : The Priority of Good and the Rationality of Evil

Noller, Jörg

Good and Evil in Recent Discussion : The Priority of Good and the Rationality of Evil

Dateien

Noller_2-h50bns2vu3pj9.pdfGröße: 158.68 KBDownloads: 87

Datum

2022

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Hybrid

Sammlungen

Philosophie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie. Springer. 2022, 5(1), pp. 89-92. ISSN 2522-0063. eISSN 2522-0071. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s42048-022-00120-3

Zusammenfassung

This paper develops a critical account of evil. By referring to Kant’s moral philosophy, I argue that evil actions have reasons and cannot be explained in terms of a lack of reason. However, these reasons of evil are not obvious but rather forms of rational self-deception. I therefore argue that the phenomenon of evil is complex and involves three dimensions: (i) activity, (ii) reasons, and (iii) (self-)deception.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

100 Philosophie

Zitieren

ISO 690

NOLLER, Jörg, 2022. Good and Evil in Recent Discussion : The Priority of Good and the Rationality of Evil. In: Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie. Springer. 2022, 5(1), pp. 89-92. ISSN 2522-0063. eISSN 2522-0071. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s42048-022-00120-3

BibTex

@article{Noller2022-05-02Recen-57543,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1007/s42048-022-00120-3},
  title={Good and Evil in Recent Discussion : The Priority of Good and the Rationality of Evil},
  number={1},
  volume={5},
  issn={2522-0063},
  journal={Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie},
  pages={89--92},
  author={Noller, Jörg}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57543">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper develops a critical account of evil. By referring to Kant’s moral philosophy, I argue that evil actions have reasons and cannot be explained in terms of a lack of reason. However, these reasons of evil are not obvious but rather forms of rational self-deception. I therefore argue that the phenomenon of evil is complex and involves three dimensions: (i) activity, (ii) reasons, and (iii) (self-)deception.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-16T14:04:00Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57543/1/Noller_2-h50bns2vu3pj9.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Noller, Jörg</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57543"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Noller, Jörg</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57543/1/Noller_2-h50bns2vu3pj9.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2022-05-02</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Good and Evil in Recent Discussion : The Priority of Good and the Rationality of Evil</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-16T14:04:00Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja