Light-induced dipolar spectroscopy : A quantitative comparison between LiDEER and LaserIMD
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Nanometric distance measurements with EPR spectroscopy yield crucial information on the structure and interactions of macromolecules in complex systems. The range of suitable spin labels for such measurements was recently expanded with a new class of light-inducible labels: the triplet state of porphyrins. Importantly, accurate distance measurements between a triplet label and a nitroxide have been reported with two distinct light-induced spectroscopy techniques, (light-induced) triplet-nitroxide DEER (LiDEER) and laser-induced magnetic dipole spectroscopy (LaserIMD). In this work, we set out to quantitatively compare the two techniques under equivalent conditions at Q band. Since we find that LiDEER using a rectangular pump pulse does not reach the high modulation depth that can be achieved with LaserIMD, we further explore the possibility of improving the LiDEER experiment with chirp inversion pulses. LiDEER employing a broadband pump pulse results in a drastic improvement of the modulation depth. The relative performance of chirp LiDEER and Laser-IMD in terms of modulation-to-noise ratio is found to depend on the dipolar evolution time: While LaserIMD yields higher modulation-to-noise ratios than LiDEER at short dipolar evolution times (τ=2μs), the high phase memory time of the triplet spins causes the situation to revert at τ=6μs.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BIEBER, Anna, Dennis BÜCKER, Malte DRESCHER, 2018. Light-induced dipolar spectroscopy : A quantitative comparison between LiDEER and LaserIMD. In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2018, 296, pp. 29-35. ISSN 1090-7807. eISSN 1096-0856. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.08.006BibTex
@article{Bieber2018-11Light-44328,
year={2018},
doi={10.1016/j.jmr.2018.08.006},
title={Light-induced dipolar spectroscopy : A quantitative comparison between LiDEER and LaserIMD},
volume={296},
issn={1090-7807},
journal={Journal of Magnetic Resonance},
pages={29--35},
author={Bieber, Anna and Bücker, Dennis and Drescher, Malte}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44328">
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44328/1/Bieber_2-q5ykeoceq154.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Drescher, Malte</dc:contributor>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29"/>
<dcterms:issued>2018-11</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Bieber, Anna</dc:creator>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44328/1/Bieber_2-q5ykeoceq154.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Drescher, Malte</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Nanometric distance measurements with EPR spectroscopy yield crucial information on the structure and interactions of macromolecules in complex systems. The range of suitable spin labels for such measurements was recently expanded with a new class of light-inducible labels: the triplet state of porphyrins. Importantly, accurate distance measurements between a triplet label and a nitroxide have been reported with two distinct light-induced spectroscopy techniques, (light-induced) triplet-nitroxide DEER (LiDEER) and laser-induced magnetic dipole spectroscopy (LaserIMD). In this work, we set out to quantitatively compare the two techniques under equivalent conditions at Q band. Since we find that LiDEER using a rectangular pump pulse does not reach the high modulation depth that can be achieved with LaserIMD, we further explore the possibility of improving the LiDEER experiment with chirp inversion pulses. LiDEER employing a broadband pump pulse results in a drastic improvement of the modulation depth. The relative performance of chirp LiDEER and Laser-IMD in terms of modulation-to-noise ratio is found to depend on the dipolar evolution time: While LaserIMD yields higher modulation-to-noise ratios than LiDEER at short dipolar evolution times (τ=2μs), the high phase memory time of the triplet spins causes the situation to revert at τ=6μs.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:contributor>Bücker, Dennis</dc:contributor>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-14T13:03:22Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Bücker, Dennis</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:title>Light-induced dipolar spectroscopy : A quantitative comparison between LiDEER and LaserIMD</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Bieber, Anna</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-14T13:03:22Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44328"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
