Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Betsch_206963.pdf
Betsch_206963.pdfGröße: 180.28 KBDownloads: 3252
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Betsch, Cornelia
Brewer, Noel T.
Brocard, Pauline
Davies, Patrick
Leask, Julie
Renkewitz, Frank
Reyna, Valerie F.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Vaccine. 2012, 30(25), pp. 3727-3733. ISSN 0264-410X. eISSN 1873-2518. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
Zusammenfassung

A growing number of people use the Internet to obtain health information, including information about vaccines. Websites that allow and promote interaction among users are an increasingly popular source of health information. Users of such so-called Web 2.0 applications (e.g. social media), while still in the minority, represent a growing proportion of online communicators, including vocal and active anti-vaccination groups as well as public health communicators. In this paper, the authors: define Web 2.0 and examine how it may influence vaccination decisions; discuss how anti-vaccination movements use Web 2.0 as well as the challenges Web 2.0 holds for public health communicators; describe the types of information used in these different settings; introduce the theoretical background that can be used to design effective vaccination communication in a Web 2.0 environment; make recommendations for practice and pose open questions for future research. The authors conclude that, as a result of the Internet and Web 2.0, private and public concerns surrounding vaccinations have the potential to virally spread across the globe in a quick, efficient and vivid manner. Web 2.0 may influence vaccination decisions by delivering information that alters the perceived personal risk of vaccine-preventable diseases or vaccination side-effects. It appears useful for public health officials to put effort into increasing the effectiveness of existing communication by implementing interactive, customized communication. A key step to providing successful public health communication is to identify those who are particularly vulnerable to finding and using unreliable and misleading information. Thus, it appears worthwhile that public health websites strive to be easy to find, easy to use, attractive in its presentation and readily provide the information, support and advice that the searcher is looking for. This holds especially when less knowledgeable individuals are in need of reliable information about vaccination risks and benefits.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BETSCH, Cornelia, Noel T. BREWER, Pauline BROCARD, Patrick DAVIES, Wolfgang GAISSMAIER, Niels HAASE, Julie LEASK, Frank RENKEWITZ, Britta RENNER, Valerie F. REYNA, Constanze ROSSMANN, Katharina SACHSE, Alexander SCHACHINGER, Michael SIEGRIST, Marybelle STRYK, 2012. Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. In: Vaccine. 2012, 30(25), pp. 3727-3733. ISSN 0264-410X. eISSN 1873-2518. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
BibTex
@article{Betsch2012-05-28Oppor-20696,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025},
  title={Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions},
  number={25},
  volume={30},
  issn={0264-410X},
  journal={Vaccine},
  pages={3727--3733},
  author={Betsch, Cornelia and Brewer, Noel T. and Brocard, Pauline and Davies, Patrick and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang and Haase, Niels and Leask, Julie and Renkewitz, Frank and Renner, Britta and Reyna, Valerie F. and Rossmann, Constanze and Sachse, Katharina and Schachinger, Alexander and Siegrist, Michael and Stryk, Marybelle}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/20696">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Sachse, Katharina</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Leask, Julie</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Stryk, Marybelle</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Siegrist, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Rossmann, Constanze</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Renkewitz, Frank</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Davies, Patrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Renkewitz, Frank</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Haase, Niels</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schachinger, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Reyna, Valerie F.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-10-16T09:33:46Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Sachse, Katharina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Rossmann, Constanze</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Stryk, Marybelle</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2012-05-28</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Schachinger, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/20696/2/Betsch_206963.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Leask, Julie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Vaccine ; 30 (2012), 25. - S. 3727-3733</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Brewer, Noel T.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/20696/2/Betsch_206963.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/20696"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A growing number of people use the Internet to obtain health information, including information about vaccines. Websites that allow and promote interaction among users are an increasingly popular source of health information. Users of such so-called Web 2.0 applications (e.g. social media), while still in the minority, represent a growing proportion of online communicators, including vocal and active anti-vaccination groups as well as public health communicators. In this paper, the authors: define Web 2.0 and examine how it may influence vaccination decisions; discuss how anti-vaccination movements use Web 2.0 as well as the challenges Web 2.0 holds for public health communicators; describe the types of information used in these different settings; introduce the theoretical background that can be used to design effective vaccination communication in a Web 2.0 environment; make recommendations for practice and pose open questions for future research. The authors conclude that, as a result of the Internet and Web 2.0, private and public concerns surrounding vaccinations have the potential to virally spread across the globe in a quick, efficient and vivid manner. Web 2.0 may influence vaccination decisions by delivering information that alters the perceived personal risk of vaccine-preventable diseases or vaccination side-effects. It appears useful for public health officials to put effort into increasing the effectiveness of existing communication by implementing interactive, customized communication. A key step to providing successful public health communication is to identify those who are particularly vulnerable to finding and using unreliable and misleading information. Thus, it appears worthwhile that public health websites strive to be easy to find, easy to use, attractive in its presentation and readily provide the information, support and advice that the searcher is looking for. This holds especially when less knowledgeable individuals are in need of reliable information about vaccination risks and benefits.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Brocard, Pauline</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Renner, Britta</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Haase, Niels</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Brocard, Pauline</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Davies, Patrick</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Siegrist, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Renner, Britta</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Brewer, Noel T.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Reyna, Valerie F.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-10-16T09:33:46Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen