Business as a pivotal actor in the politics of training reform : insights from the case of Germany

Busemeyer, Marius R.

Business as a pivotal actor in the politics of training reform : insights from the case of Germany

Dateien

Busemeyer_226610.pdfGröße: 118.53 KBDownloads: 505

Datum

2012

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2012, 50(4), pp. 690-713. ISSN 0007-1080. eISSN 1467-8543. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00900.x

Zusammenfassung

Often admired by international observers, the German dual training system has come under pressure in recent years because of a persistent lack in training slots for young people. The article addresses the question of how policy makers have reacted to the problems in the training market. Particular attention is paid to the formation of politico-economic coalitions between state actors, business representatives and unions. On the basis of three case studies of recent reforms (or reform attempts), we identify two types of cross-class coalitions: a conservative coalition that aims at maintaining the status quo of the firm-based training regime and a segmentalist coalition promoting the gradual transformation of the system towards a less collective and more firm-centred variety. In both kinds of politico-economic coalitions, business actors play a pivotal role. The reason for the privileged position of business in the politics of training reform is, I argue, a politically constructed dependency of the state and unions on the continued co-operation of business in the provision of training slots. In the conclusion, I discuss the implications of my findings for the debate on the dualization of co-ordinated market economies.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

BUSEMEYER, Marius R., 2012. Business as a pivotal actor in the politics of training reform : insights from the case of Germany. In: British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2012, 50(4), pp. 690-713. ISSN 0007-1080. eISSN 1467-8543. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00900.x

BibTex

@article{Busemeyer2012Busin-22661,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00900.x},
  title={Business as a pivotal actor in the politics of training reform : insights from the case of Germany},
  number={4},
  volume={50},
  issn={0007-1080},
  journal={British Journal of Industrial Relations},
  pages={690--713},
  author={Busemeyer, Marius R.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/22661">
    <dcterms:title>Business as a pivotal actor in the politics of training reform : insights from the case of Germany</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/22661/2/Busemeyer_226610.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>British Journal of Industrial Relations ; 50 (2012), 4. - S. 690-713</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:creator>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Often admired by international observers, the German dual training system has come under pressure in recent years because of a persistent lack in training slots for young people. The article addresses the question of how policy makers have reacted to the problems in the training market. Particular attention is paid to the formation of politico-economic coalitions between state actors, business representatives and unions. On the basis of three case studies of recent reforms (or reform attempts), we identify two types of cross-class coalitions: a conservative coalition that aims at maintaining the status quo of the firm-based training regime and a segmentalist coalition promoting the gradual transformation of the system towards a less collective and more firm-centred variety. In both kinds of politico-economic coalitions, business actors play a pivotal role. The reason for the privileged position of business in the politics of training reform is, I argue, a politically constructed dependency of the state and unions on the continued co-operation of business in the provision of training slots. In the conclusion, I discuss the implications of my findings for the debate on the dualization of co-ordinated market economies.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/22661"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-04-03T11:45:54Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/22661/2/Busemeyer_226610.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-04-03T11:45:54Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja