A "culture of conservatism" : How and why African Union member states obstruct the deepening of integration

Welz, Martin

A "culture of conservatism" : How and why African Union member states obstruct the deepening of integration

Dateien

Welz_287843.pdfGröße: 78.75 KBDownloads: 827

Datum

2014

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft
Exzellenzcluster

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Strategic Review for Southern Africa. 2014, 36(1), pp. 4-24. ISSN 1013-1108

Zusammenfassung

This article explores the relations between the African Union and its member states. While there are im provements on the AU level with regard to the implementation of the African Peace and Security Architecture and the building of other institutions such as the Pan-African Parliament, it becomes apparent at the same time that on the state level governments are reluctant to engage in a deepening of the continental integration. Some countries even topple the integration process or undermine their own initiatives such as the African Peer Review Mechanism. This article examines this phenomenon, and labels the identified unwillingness to change the status quo a 'culture of conservatism'. Four explanations are offered for such a 'culture of conservatism': lack of capacity, unwillingness to surrender sovereignty, national leaders' reluctance to cede power, and the greater importance of regional economic communities as compared to the AU.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

WELZ, Martin, 2014. A "culture of conservatism" : How and why African Union member states obstruct the deepening of integration. In: Strategic Review for Southern Africa. 2014, 36(1), pp. 4-24. ISSN 1013-1108

BibTex

@article{Welz2014cultu-28784,
  year={2014},
  title={A "culture of conservatism" : How and why African Union member states obstruct the deepening of integration},
  number={1},
  volume={36},
  issn={1013-1108},
  journal={Strategic Review for Southern Africa},
  pages={4--24},
  author={Welz, Martin}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28784">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>A "culture of conservatism" : How and why African Union member states obstruct the deepening of integration</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28784"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28784/2/Welz_287843.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28784/2/Welz_287843.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article explores the relations between the African Union and its member states. While there are im provements on the AU level with regard to the implementation of the African Peace and Security Architecture and the building of other institutions such as the Pan-African Parliament, it becomes apparent at the same time that on the state level governments are reluctant to engage in a deepening of the continental integration. Some countries even topple the integration process or undermine their own initiatives such as the African Peer Review Mechanism. This article examines this phenomenon, and labels the identified unwillingness to change the status quo a 'culture of conservatism'. Four explanations are offered for such a 'culture of conservatism': lack of capacity, unwillingness to surrender sovereignty, national leaders' reluctance to cede power, and the greater importance of regional economic communities as compared to the AU.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T07:58:22Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T07:58:22Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Welz, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Strategic Review for Southern Africa ; 36 (2014), 1. - S. 4-24</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Welz, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja