Neither Goethe nor Bismarck : on the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies

Schneider, Gerald

Neither Goethe nor Bismarck : on the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies

Dateien

Neither_goethe_nor_bismarck.pdfGröße: 243.69 KBDownloads: 266

Datum

2008

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

NAURIN, Daniel, ed., Helen WALLACE, ed.. Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels. Houndsmill: Palgrave, 2008, pp. 277-289

Zusammenfassung

In a spirited attack Dorothee Heisenberg takes issue with the emerging field of quantitatively oriented European Union politics in general and the formal modelling tradition in studies on the Council of Ministers (CM) in particular. Drawing on constructivist scholarship and her important article on the culture of consensus (Heisenberg 2005) she argues in her contribution to this volume that rationalist scholarship is incapable in enlightening the whealing and dealing that characterises decision making within the intergovernmental legislative body of the European Union.
I will demonstrate that the "culture of consensus" that DH advocates is in perfect line with the rationalist scholarship as some of the extant bargaining models, which are barely mentioned, explicitly assume that actors have an inherent interest in cooperation.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Ministerrat der EU, Regionale Integration, Theoretische Modelle, Vorhersage

Zitieren

ISO 690

SCHNEIDER, Gerald, 2008. Neither Goethe nor Bismarck : on the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies. In: NAURIN, Daniel, ed., Helen WALLACE, ed.. Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels. Houndsmill: Palgrave, 2008, pp. 277-289

BibTex

@incollection{Schneider2008Neith-4001,
  year={2008},
  title={Neither Goethe nor Bismarck : on the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies},
  publisher={Palgrave},
  address={Houndsmill},
  booktitle={Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels},
  pages={277--289},
  editor={Naurin, Daniel and Wallace, Helen},
  author={Schneider, Gerald}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/4001">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/4001"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4001/1/Neither_goethe_nor_bismarck.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels / eds. Daniel Naurin and Helen Wallace. - Houndsmill : Palgrave, 2008. -  S. 277-289</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In a spirited attack Dorothee Heisenberg takes issue with the emerging field of quantitatively oriented European Union politics in general and the formal modelling tradition in studies on the Council of Ministers (CM) in particular. Drawing on constructivist scholarship and her important article on the  culture of consensus  (Heisenberg 2005) she argues in her contribution to this volume that rationalist scholarship is incapable in enlightening the whealing and dealing that characterises decision making within the intergovernmental legislative body of the European Union.&lt;br /&gt;I will demonstrate that the "culture of consensus" that DH advocates is in perfect line with the rationalist scholarship as some of the extant bargaining models, which are barely mentioned, explicitly assume that actors have an inherent interest in cooperation.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:57Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4001/1/Neither_goethe_nor_bismarck.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>Neither Goethe nor Bismarck : on the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:57Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja