Concepts Are Beliefs About Essences

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Spohn_2001_Concepts_Are_Beliefs.pdf
Spohn_2001_Concepts_Are_Beliefs.pdfGröße: 240.79 KBDownloads: 458
Datum
2001
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Proceedings of an Internat. Symposium : " Gottlob Frege : Philosophy of Logic, Language and Knowledge ". Stanford: CSLI Publ., 2001, pp. 287-316
Zusammenfassung

The most promising strategy to understand (sentential) narrow contents or (subsentential) concepts seems to be to conceive them as primary intensions or diagonals within the epistemologically reinterpreted character theory of Kaplan. However, this strategy seems to founder either at Block's dilemma between a too syntacticist or too holistic understanding of narrow contents and concepts or at Schiffer's problem that the character theory depends on functional role semantics without adding anything to it. The paper defends a way of steering midway of Block's dilemma without recourse to functional role semantics, a way perfectly summarized in its title.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690HAAS-SPOHN, Ulrike, Wolfgang SPOHN, 2001. Concepts Are Beliefs About Essences. In: Proceedings of an Internat. Symposium : " Gottlob Frege : Philosophy of Logic, Language and Knowledge ". Stanford: CSLI Publ., 2001, pp. 287-316
BibTex
@inproceedings{HaasSpohn2001Conce-3455,
  year={2001},
  title={Concepts Are Beliefs About Essences},
  publisher={CSLI Publ.},
  address={Stanford},
  booktitle={Proceedings of an Internat. Symposium : " Gottlob Frege : Philosophy of Logic, Language and Knowledge "},
  pages={287--316},
  author={Haas-Spohn, Ulrike and Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3455">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The most promising strategy to understand (sentential) narrow contents or (subsentential) concepts seems to be to conceive them as primary intensions or diagonals within the epistemologically reinterpreted character theory of Kaplan. However, this strategy seems to founder either at Block's dilemma between a too syntacticist or too holistic understanding of narrow contents and concepts or at Schiffer's problem that the character theory depends on functional role semantics without adding anything to it. The paper defends a way of steering midway of Block's dilemma without recourse to functional role semantics, a way perfectly summarized in its title.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Haas-Spohn, Ulrike</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:25Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2001</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Concepts Are Beliefs About Essences</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3455/1/Spohn_2001_Concepts_Are_Beliefs.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3455/1/Spohn_2001_Concepts_Are_Beliefs.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Proceedings of an Internat. Symposium: "Gottlob Frege: Philosophy of Logic, Language and Knowledge" - Stanford: CSLI Publ., 2001, pp. 287-316</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3455"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Haas-Spohn, Ulrike</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen