Rethinking Educational Assessment from the Perspective of Design Thinking

Authors

  • William Fisher University of California Berkeley https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0592-781X
  • Emily Pey-Tee Oon University of Macau
  • Spencer Benson Education Innovations International Consulting, University Park, Maryland, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.5.1.1537

Keywords:

Design Thinking, Multilevel Program Assessment, Mixed Methods Research, Learning Technology, Logical Types

Abstract

Because human processes are subtle, complex, and contextualized, computational representations of those processes face highly significant unmet design challenges. Design Thinking (DT) offers a potential new paradigm of creativity and innovation in education capable of effecting meaningful culture change. DT is nonlinear but encompasses elements of empathy, problem definition, ideation, prototyping, and tests that may freely move as needed from and to each other. DT's empathic focus on end users' needs suggests educational measurement's information infrastructures will have to coherently integrate assessment and instruction across multiple levels of complexity in communication. Applying DT reveals the need to attend to previously undeveloped technical issues in communication. Especially important are developmental, horizontal, and vertical forms of coherence, and denotative, metalinguistic, and metacommunicative levels of complexity. New solutions emerge when classrooms are reconceived as meta-design ecosystem niches of creativity and innovation structured from the bottom up by flows of self-organizing information. Recently identified correspondences between educational measurement and metrology support efforts aimed at developing multilevel common languages for the communication of learning outcomes. Prototype reports illustrate how emergent measured constructs can be brought into language in ways that integrate developmental, horizontal, and vertical coherence across levels of complexity. Coherent information infrastructures of these kinds are capable of adapting to new circumstances as populations of persons and items change, doing so without compromising the continuity of comparisons or the uniqueness of locally situated knowledge and practices.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-02

How to Cite

Fisher, W., Oon, E. P.-T., & Benson, S. (2021). Rethinking Educational Assessment from the Perspective of Design Thinking. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.5.1.1537

Issue

Section

Academic Articles

URN